Skip to main content
[Translate to English:]
© Kay Panten
Institute of

SF Sea Fisheries

Project

Development of physical measurement methods for non-invasive in-situ detection of plankton and fish



Annual time series
© Thünen-Insitut/Boris Cisewski
Annual time series of weekly averaged 24 h cycles of mean volume backscatter strength (MVBS) from June 2013 to May 2014 (upper panel) and from June 2014 to May 2015 (lower panel), i.e., each weekly slot shows the average 24 h cycle of that week. Overlaid is the weighted mean depth (WMD) (black lines).

Within the scope of this project, hydroacoustic and optical instruments and methods will be used jointly and further developed to enable the continuous, automated, hogh-resolution and non-invasive recording of marine organisms in their natural environment. Furthermore, we aim to extend the understanding of the functional relationships of organisms of different trophic levels (e.g. fish and zooplankton) as well as potential behavioural patterns such as the vertical migration of individual species.

Background and Objective

The objective of the project is to use hydroacoustic and optical methods to enable the continuous, automated, high-resolution and non-invasive recording of marine organisms in their natural environment. Hereby, optical and acoustic methods can be used individually or in combination, in order to complement traditional sampling with net catches, since both methods can be used non-invasively in a wide variety of environments and provide high spatial and temporal resolution. For the detection of fish and zooplankton, for example, the acoustic methods with lower frequencies (38-200 kHz) offer the advantage that they can be used at moderate distances (tens to hundreds of meters) and cover large volumes. On the other hand, optical methods can be used to distinctly identify animals such as fish and zooplankton organisms; provided the magnification is large enough and the water is clear. In this context, so-called in-situ-instruments are employed at the Thünen Institute on various stationary, but also mobile equipment carriers, and autonomous evaluation procedures are being further developed to make use of the advantages of both optical and acoustic methods.

Target Group

Policy makers, Marine and Fisheries scientists

Approach

At the Thünen Institute, a wide variety of camera and sonar systems are used individually or in combination for continuous, partially automated, high-resolution and non-invasive recording of marine organisms. For example, based on the combination of a moored Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) and a video plankton recorder, the distribution patterns of zooplankton communities were studied with a high spatial and temporal resolution. The video plankton recorder also offers the advantage of investigating fragile species, such as gelatinous plankton, in-situ and, in combination with the ADCPs, identifying any zooplankton species through this imaging technique. The ADCP allows not only for a 3D measurement of the flow field, but also for a measurement of the acoustic backscatter strength along all four sound beams. With these data, it is possible to investigate daily or also seasonal vertical migration patterns of individual zooplankton communities. In general, however, the accurate characterization of different marine ecosystems with hydroacoustic data is limited without the additional integration of biological information. At the same time, only limited quantitative information can be derived from the use of optical data. Accordingly, since the acoustic and optical monitoring systems both have their individual advantages, but also weaknesses, both measuring methods have been and will be used simultaneously in several studies to benefit from the chosen combinations and to enable an autonomous and non-invasive monitoring of different marine ecosystems and their resources in the medium term.

Our Research Questions

How can optical and hydroacoustic measurement devices and their evaluation methods be best combined and further developed, depending on the scientific question, to enable an automated, non-invasive, and temporally and spatially high-resolution monitoring of marine ecosystems? How can we improve hydroacoustic and optical measuring methods and the quality of the data provided?

Preliminary Results

Publications in international journals Presentations and publications in the framework of different ICES expert groups, e.g., Working Group on Operational Oceanographic Products for Fisheries and Environment (WGOOFE), Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST), Working Group on International Pelagic Surveys (WGIPS) Presentations at international scientific conferences

Duration

1.2015 - 12.2027

More Information

Project status: ongoing

Publications

  1. 0

    Böer G, Gröger JP, Badri-Höher S, Cisewski B, Renkewitz H, Mittermayer F, Strickmann T, Schramm H (2023) A deep-learning based pipeline for estimating the abundance and size of aquatic organisms in an unconstrained underwater environment from continuously captured stereo video. Sensors 23(6):3311, DOI:10.3390/s23063311

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn066163.pdf

  2. 1

    Hoeher PA, Zenk O, Cisewski B, Boos K, Gröger JP (2023) UVC-based biofouling suppression for long-term deployment of underwater cameras. IEEE J Ocean Eng 48(4):1389-1405, DOI:10.1109/JOE.2023.3265164

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn066607.pdf

  3. 2

    Gastauer S, Nickels CF, Ohman MD (2022) Body size- and season-dependent diel vertical migration of mesozooplankton resolved acoustically in the San Diego Trough. Limnol Oceanogr 67(2):300-313, DOI:10.1002/lno.11993

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064332.pdf

  4. 3

    Blanluet A, Gastauer S, Cattanéo F, Goulon C, Grimardias D, Guillard J (2022) Discrimination between schools and submerged trees in reservoirs: A preliminary approach using narrowband and broadband acoustics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 79(5):738-748, DOI:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0087

  5. 4

    Schaber M, Gastauer S, Cisewski B, Hielscher NN, Janke M, Pena M, Sakinan S, Thorburn J (2022) Extensive oceanic mesopelagic habitat use of a migratory continental shark species. Sci Rep 12:2047, DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-05989-z

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064834.pdf

  6. 5

    Czudaj S, Koppelmann R, Möllmann C, Schaber M, Fock HO (2021) Community structure of mesopelagic fishes constituting sound scattering layers in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. J Mar Syst 224:103635, DOI:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2021.103635

  7. 6

    Marohn L, Schaber M, Freese M, Pohlmann J-D, Wysujack K, Czudaj S, Blancke T, Hanel R (2021) Distribution and diel vertical migration of mesopelagic fishes in the Southern Sargasso Sea - observations through hydroacoustics and stratified catches. Mar Biodiv 51:87, DOI:10.1007/s12526-021-01216-6

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064213.pdf

  8. 7

    Bairstow F, Gastauer S, Finley LA, Edwards T, Brown CTA, Kawaguchi S, Cox MJ (2021) Improving the accuracy of krill target strength using a shape catalog. Front Mar Sci 8:658384, DOI:10.3389/fmars.2021.658384

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064334.pdf

  9. 8

    von Appen W-J, Waite AM, Bergmann M, Bienhold C, Boebel O, Bracher A, Cisewski B, Hagemann J, Hoppema M, Iversen MH, Konrad C, Krumpen T, Lochthofen N, Metfies K, Niehoff B, Nöthig E-M, Purser A, Salter I, Schaber M, Scholz D, et al (2021) Sea-ice derived meltwater stratification slows the biological carbon pump: results from continuous observations. Nature Comm 12:7309, DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-26943-z

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064335.pdf

  10. 9

    Burkhardt E, Opzeeland IC van, Cisewski B, Mattmüller R, Meister M, Schall E, Spiesecke S, Thomisch K, Zwicker S, Boebel O (2021) Seasonal and diel cycles of fin whale acoustic occurrence near Elephant Island, Antarctica. Royal Soc Open Sci 8:201142, DOI:10.1098/rsos.201142

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063644.pdf

  11. 10

    Cisewski B, Hatun H, Kristiansen I, Hansen B, Larsen KMH, Eliasen SK, Jacobsen JA (2021) Vertical migration of pelagic and mesopelagic scatterers from ADCP backscatter data in the Southern Norwegian Sea. Front Mar Sci 7:542386, DOI:10.3389/fmars.2020.542386

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063248.pdf

  12. 11

    Fischer P, Brix H, Baschek B, Kraberg AC, Brand M, Cisewski B, Riethmüller R, Breitbach G, Möller KO, Gattuso J-P, Alliouane S, van de Poll WH, Witbaard R (2020) Operating cabled underwater observatories in rough shelf-sea environments: A technological challenge. Front Mar Sci 7:551, DOI:10.3389/fmars.2020.00551

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn062587.pdf

  13. 12

    Cisewski B, Strass VH (2016) Acoustic insights into the zooplankton dynamics of the eastern Weddell Sea. Progr Oceanogr 144:42-92, DOI:10.1016/j.pocean.2016.03.005

  14. 13

    Gastauer S, Fässler SM, O'Donnel C, Høines A, Jakbsen JA, Krysov AI, Smith L, Tangen Ø, Anthonypillai V, Mortensen E, Armstrong E, Schaber M, Scoulding B (2016) The distribution of blue whiting west of the British Isles and Ireland. Fish Res 183:32-43, DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.012

  15. 14

    Schulz J, Möller KO, Bracher A, Hieronymi M, Cisewski B, Barz K, Gröger JP, Stepputtis D, et al (2015) Aquatische optische Technologien in Deutschland [online]. Warnemünde: Leibniz-Institut für Ostseeforschung, 92 p, Meereswiss Ber 97, zu finden in <http://www.io-warnemuende.de/tl_files/forschung/meereswissenschaftliche-berichte/mebe97_2015-schulz.pdf> [zitiert am 15.12.2015]

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn056088.pdf

    Scroll to top