Skip to main content
[Translate to English:]
[Translate to English:]
Institute of

WF Forestry

Peer-reviewed articles of Dr. Jörg Schweinle

  1. 0

    Wolff S, Schweinle J (2022) Effectiveness and economic viability of forest certification: a systematic review. Forests 13(5):798, DOI:10.3390/f13050798

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064897.pdf

  2. 1

    Cui S, Lippe RS, Schweinle J (2022) Informal employment in the forest sector: A scoping review. Forests 13(3):460, DOI:10.3390/f13030460

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064763.pdf

  3. 2

    Lippe RS, Cui S, Schweinle J (2021) Estimating global forest-based employment. Forests 12(9):1219, DOI:10.3390/f12091219

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063946.pdf

  4. 3

    Kulisic B, Gagnon B, Schweinle J, Van Holsbeeck S, Brown M, Simurina J, Dimitriou I, McDonald H (2021) The contributions of biomass supply for bioenergy in the Post-COVID-19 recovery. Energies 14:8415, DOI:10.3390/en14248415

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn064310.pdf

  5. 4

    Schweinle J, Geng N, Iost S, Weimar H, Jochem D (2020) Monitoring sustainability effects of the bioeconomy: a material flow based approach using the example of softwood lumber and its core product epal 1 pallet. Sustainability 12(6):2444, DOI:10.3390/su12062444

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn062173.pdf

  6. 5

    Iost S, Labonte NT, Banse M, Geng N, Jochem D, Schweinle J, Weber SA, Weimar H (2019) German bioeconomy: economic importance and concept of measurement [online]. German J Agric Econ 68(4):275-288, zu finden in <https://www.gjae-online.de/articles/german-bioeconomy-economic-importance-and-concept-of-measurement/> [zitiert am 03.12.2019]

  7. 6

    Schweinle J, Köthke M, Englert H, Dieter M (2018) Simulation of forest-based carbon balances for Germany: a contribution to the "carbon debt" debate. WIREs Energy Environ 7(1):1-15, DOI:10.1002/wene.260

  8. 7

    Dale VH, Kline KL, Parish ES, Cowie A, Emory R, Malmsheimer RW, Slade R, Smith CT, Wigley TB, Bentsen NS, Berndes G, Bernier P, Chum HL, Diaz-Chavez R, Egnell G, Gustavsson L, Schweinle J, Stupak I, Trianosky P, Walter A, et al (2017) Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 9(8):1296-1305, DOI:10.1111/gcbb.12445

    https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn058851.pdf

  9. 8

    Zimmermann K, Schweinle J (2015) Supply chain-based business models for woodfuel. In: Butler Manning D, Bemmann A, Bredemeier M, Lamersdorf N, Ammer C (eds) Bioenergy from dendromass for the sustainable development of rural areas. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, pp 289-302

  10. 9

    Tromborg E, Ranta T, Schweinle J, Solberg B, Skjevrak G, Tiffany DG (2013) Economic sustainability for wood pellets production - a comparative study between Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden and the US. Biomass Bioenergy 57:68-77, DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.030

  11. 10

    Fröhling F, Schweinle J, Meyer JC, Schultmann F (2011) Logistics of renewable raw materials. In: Ulber R, Sell D, Hirth T (eds) Renewable raw materials : new feedstocks for the chemical industry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, pp 49-90

  12. 11

    Faix A, Schweinle J, Schöll S, Becker G, Meier D (2010) (GTI-tcbiomass) life-cycle assessment of the BTO-process (Biomass-to-oil) with combined heat and power generation. Environ Progress Sustainable Energy 29(2):193-202

  13. 12

    Rödl A, Schweinle J (2010) Ökobilanz des Anbaus von Kurzumtriebsplantagen sowie der energetischen Verwendung des Holzes. In: Bemmann A, Knust C (eds) Agrowood : Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und europäische Perspektiven. Berlin: Weißensee-Verl, pp 189-207

  14. 13

    Kröber M, Heinrich J, Wagner P, Schweinle J (2010) Ökonomische Bewertung und Einordnung von Kurzumtriebsplantagen in die gesamtbetriebliche Anbaustruktur. In: Bemmann A, Knust C (eds) Agrowood : Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und europäische Perspektiven. Berlin: Weißensee-Verl, pp 217-229

    Scroll to top