Skip to main content
A timber truck fully loaded with logs drives over a very simple wooden bridge in a forest.
© Thünen-Institut
A timber truck fully loaded with logs drives over a very simple wooden bridge in a forest.
Institute of

WF Forestry

New publication compares the expiring EU Timber Regulation with the new EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains

The EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains (EUDR) will soon replace the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR). A study by the Thünen Institute examines the impact on companies in the timber sector and control authorities in the EU.

A collage of four motifs, top left a palm oil plantation, top right rainforest deforestation, bottom left view of Hamburg harbor with container bridges and container ship, bottom right a basket full of red coffee beans and two hands with coffee beans
© ThKatz - stock.adobe.com; Tarcisio Schnaider/stock.adobe.com; Beate Büttner; PixieMe - stock.adobe.com

The EU adopted the regulation on deforestation-free supply chains (EUDR) to reduce its influence on global deforestation and forest degradation. The EUDR prohibits certain ‘forest risk commodities' and products made thereof on the EU market unless they are deforestation-free and legal under the legislation of the producer countries. The EUDR will replace the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) which only covers the illegality of timber products. The EUDR concept adopts the basic approach of the EUTR, but aims to overcome weaknesses that left loopholes for non-compliant enterprises.

The study compares the specifications of both regulations, to examine whether and how weaknesses of the EUTR have been addressed by its successor regulation. Impacts for enterprises in the wood sector and control authorities in the EU were discussed. The study concludes that the EUDR closes some important loopholes that previously existed. This is due to three elements in particular: the introduction of mandatory digital registration combined with control options for customs authorities; the increase in liability obligations for EU internal trade; and the reduction of EU member states’ leeway in shaping national legislation and enforcement. However, the EUDR creates considerable additional burdens for enterprises and control authorities. This is due to both significantly expanded reporting requirements and an enormous extension of the scope of application. It remains open how strongly the EUDR will affect the procurement costs of EU enterprises and subsequently their product prices – and to what extent this may trigger trade shifts in favor of less regulated countries.

Scroll to top