Deputy Director

Secretariat

Kerstin Martens
Institute of Farm Economics

Bundesallee 63
38116 Braunschweig
Phone: +49 531 596 5102
Fax: +49 531 596 5199
bw@thuenen.de


Agricultural policy instruments to support farm level risk management

Project

Bauer vor Weizenfeld (c) Fotodesign Märzinger/Fotolia
(© Fotodesign Märzinger/Fotolia)

Both climate change and increasing liberalisation of EU agricultural policy involve the danger of increasing volatility and economic risk at the farm level.

Background and Objective

Therefore we analyse if and how agricultural policies can improve and support farm risk management.

The project aims to

  • analyse risk exposure of farms in Germany.
  • compile and systematise options for policy instruments for reducing volatility and improve farm risk management.
  • improve the methodical basis for comprehensive impact assessment.

Approach

For this purpose, a concept which is capable to illustrate and analyse volatility will be developed and implemented in existing economic models. This enables quantitative cost-benefit analysis of different risk management instruments and selected governance options.

As a first step, a systematic compilation and assessment of selected farm level risk management instruments has been undertaken. The focus has been on external risk management instruments which are currently not common in Germany or which are being intensively discussed.

Preliminary Results

First Results:

The results show that there exists a wide range of potential instruments to improve risk management on the farm level. Instruments which are revenue-based play an important role in the USA, but they are not common in the EU. Instruments which are aimed at margins or income offer very effective hedging. However, implementing such programs often pose considerable administrative challenges. This can be seen as a crucial reason why these instruments are seldom used internationally. Index based (subsidised) tools are relatively widespread in the USA, however, they are only occasionally used in European countries. In this field, there is potential for future developments which reduce the basis risk of index based approaches.

We have examined the effects of an EU-subsidised income stabilisation instrument for Germany. It is a hedging instrument which pays in case of significant income loss. Farmers have to contribute to a fund and receive payments when the income reduction amounts to more than 30 percent of a farmer’s three-year average annual income. The maximum compensation is 70 percent of the income loss.

This hedging instrument is applied to income and thus covers a variety of different single risks. The analyses show that costs for compensation payments vary considerably between different years and are very high in certain years. In the period considered, the share of farmers with an income loss of more than 30 percent varies from about 18 to 40 percent. Compensation payments for farmers would be between 600 to 800 million € annually (based on the ten-year average for the 2006/07 to 2014/15 period), depending on the contractual agreements. The highest compensation payment would have occurred in 2014/15 (1.2-1.6 billion €). The payment of contributions for an obligatory participation with a subsidy rate of 65 % would be about 19-24 € per ha UAA and year based on an historic ten-year average. Without subsidies, i.e. an exclusive funding by farmers, the level of contributions would be accordingly higher: about 53-69 € per ha UAA and year.

This calculations show that the volatility of income is significantly reduced by the analysed income insurance. In the hypothetical case with income insurance, the coefficient of variation is below that of the case without insurance (-25 to -29 %).

Administrative costs are estimated to be very high. Challenges for the implementation consist of an appropriate and secure registration of compensation rights and compensation extents. A variety of detailed challenges are due to the structure of German agriculture (farms with no legal obligation to keep accountancy records, scope for design of tax declarations, complex company structures and structural change). Generally, a considerable time lag between income reporting and income compensation payments has to be expected. Thus, the contribution to the reduction of income volatility can be reduced considerably, or income volatility might be even increased in the following years.

Thünen-Contact


Involved Thünen-Partners


Duration

5.2017 - 5.2021

More Information

Projekt type:
Project status: ongoing

Publications to the project

hits: 5

  1. Offermann F, Efken J, Ellßel R, Hansen H, Klepper R, Weber SA (2017) Ausgewählte Instrumente zum Risikomanagement in der Landwirtschaft: Systematische Zusammenstellung und Bewertung. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, 52 p, Thünen Working Paper 72, DOI:10.3220/WP1492604951000
    pdf document (limited accessibility) 868 kb
  2. Ellßel R, Offermann F (2016) Das US - Dairy Margin Protection Program - Wirkungsweise und Übertragbarkeit auf Deutschland : Tagung der SGA-SSE, 31.03.2016 Grangeneuve (Schweiz) [online]. Braunschweig; Hamburg: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, 14 p, zu finden in <http://www.sse-sga.ch/_downloads/T16_Ellssel.pdf> [zitiert am 03.01.2017]
    pdf document (limited accessibility) 445 kb
  3. Ellßel R, Offermann F (2016) Das US-Margin Protection Program for Dairy - Wirkungsweise und Übertragbarkeit auf Deutschland [online]. Tänikon: SGA, 3 p, zu finden in <http://archive.sse-sga.ch/Tagung16/Ellssel.pdf> [zitiert am 28.12.2016]
  4. Offermann F (2015) Beurteilung agrarpolitischer Maßnahmen zur Unterstützung von Anpassungen an Extremwetterlagen. Thünen Rep 30:225-239
  5. Ellßel R, Offermann F (2015) Ein "Schutzengel" für Milcherzeuger? Top Agrar(10):120-122